Ventilation might help slow COVID-19 spread but let’s not forget energy use

Photo by Nishant Parikh on Unsplash

While the evidence so far indicates that increasing outside air circulation may help prevent the spread of COVID-19 in buildings, some common sense goes a long way for facility managers looking to keep occupants safe without wasting energy on overzealous air circulation. 


All buildings are created for people and building owners must ensure they are safe. But unfortunately, as with most things in life, there is no guidebook setting out the “ideal” way to achieve that outcome. This is especially true in a pandemic.

Recently, research has been published in the journal Nature that suggests the SARS-CoV-2 virus strain that causes COVID-19 may have the potential to be transmitted via aerosols (airborne particles less than 5µm diameter). And reports from laboratory experiments published in the New England Journal of Medicine have demonstrated that the virus can potentially remain viable in aerosols for up to three hours under common indoor conditions. More alarmingly, there are also as yet unpublished research reports that suggest COVID-19 ribonucleic acid (RNA) may be recirculated in particles swept off surfaces after lying dried out and dormant for hours or even days (although expert commentators have noted similar material can be found on dinosaur fossils and it doesn’t necessarily mean they are alive!).

These findings follow analyses of other coronaviruses, including those that caused SARS and MERS, which found it was possible that some infections in the past may have occurred from breathing in tiny virus-laden aerosols.

So, despite much debate within the scientific community that may take years to resolve, in theory at least, it may be possible for people to contract COVID-19 by breathing in tiny particles that have been floating around the indoor air for some hours.

But on the other hand, one thing seems abundantly clear: COVID-19 infections are many thousands (millions?) of times more likely to come direct from pathways described by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in their authoritative “Getting workplaces ready for COVID-19” document, not from aerosols.

What are the appropriate precautions? 

Quite sensibly, many of the Heating, Ventilation and Air-Conditioning (HVAC) industry’s leading authorities are recommending a cautious approach to the management of building systems during this period.

The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers (CIBSE) has issued detailed and helpful guidance on appropriate measures to reduce transmission risks in buildings. ASHRAE, the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Airconditioning Engineers, has also recently issued a position document on infectious aerosols that can be reduced to two key points:

  • airborne exposure to the virus should be controlled; and
  • ventilation and filtration provided by HVAC systems can reduce the risk of transmission through the air, so disabling of HVAC systems to reduce the transmission of the virus is not recommended.

Maximising the circulation of outside air is always considered a good practice for human health, especially when ambient conditions are favourable. CIBSE notes that the potential public health benefit of increasing outside air circulation at this time “outweighs the reduction in energy efficiency caused by not recirculating air”; but this is where common sense needs to be applied. For example, among its “recommended precautionary measures”, the Federation of European Heating, Ventilation and Airconditioning Associations (REHVA), recommends outside air ventilation systems be operated at low speed 24/7 during the pandemic (and at constant full speed during regular operating hours and for two hours beforehand).

Can the energy and environmental cost of constantly running HVAC equipment be justified on available evidence? With deployment of highly sophisticated optimisation and control strategies, perhaps… But it is important to note that for an HVAC system (or indoor air) to be contaminated, there must already be a source inside the building that is spreading the disease through coughing or sneezing large droplets (> 10µm diameter). Such material that travels about 1-2 metres from the infected person and falls to surfaces should be the main concern of building operators.

This is why, in addition to WHO guidance on hand-washing, hygiene and cleaning, leading virologists and aerosol scientists recommend avoiding indoor meetings and suggest wearing masks at all times because masks offer double, two-way protection. Whether those measures are practical, or not, will depend on the circumstances.

So, if there was a guidebook for how to protect the health and wellbeing of building occupants during these times, it would probably suggest that ramping up the airconditioning may not be necessary, and is certainly not sufficient, to keep people safe from COVID-19.

Dr Craig Roussac is co-founder and CEO of Buildings Alive.


If you would like to contribute to Spinifex please send a note to editorial@thefifthestate.com.au

If so you might also like to consider that a paid subscription will help support The Fifth Estate as a channel for your work. 

Tags: , ,

Comments

2 Responses to “Ventilation might help slow COVID-19 spread but let’s not forget energy use”

  • Sonam says:

    Your statement “ramping up the airconditioning may not be necessary” is vague and potentially very misleading. The US CDC has issued very clear guidelines about ventilation.

    For instance:
    “Take steps to improve ventilation in the building:
    Increase the percentage of outdoor air (e.g., using economizer modes of HVAC operations) potentially as high as 100% (first verify compatibility with HVAC system capabilities for both temperature and humidity control as well as compatibility with outdoor/indoor air quality considerations).”

    This is from the US CDC website, which offers lots of clear, pertinent advice:
    https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/office-buildings.html

  • Frank Brown says:

    I like Sydney’s Galleries building opposite the QVB on the corner of George and Park Sts.

    While it may look like a big airconditioned block – the central atrium with glass roof is actually open-sided at the top – allowing pleasant natural convection to remove warmer air – and more pleasant air to be drawn in from outside.

    why spend money heating when you can benefit from natural ventilation ?

    https://goo.gl/maps/pjGQWvRYpLNLb5de8

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have Your Say
Submit an Article »

More Articles on this Topic