Tweet
                                               

Low carbon cement revolution – the options now and the challenges still ahead

In New Zealand, concrete (of which cement is a key ingredient) was recently identified alongside steel as the highest-emitting building materials to make and use in the country.

A key takeaway in the report was the potential of low carbon cement alternatives. So, are we using these alternatives? The Fifth Estate checked in with high blend cements, geopolymer cement and a new technology used by LafargeHolcim that uses CO2 instead of water in the curing process.


The technological solutions are already available to make the move to low carbon cement for construction, according to University of Melbourne zero carbon researcher Michael Lord.

Sadly, he says there are still “huge institutional barriers” standing in the way of these low carbon options.

“We just need the incentives created to get there.”

He told The Fifth Estate that the big barrier is cost. Some commercially available low carbon alternatives remain around 10-15 per cent more expensive than the conventional version, even though there’s not always inherent reasons for the inflated prices.

The problem is that the demand just isn’t there. “These are still niche products.”

Another barrier is the legacy left by decades and centuries of using the standard Portland cement. Lord says there’s a perceived risk for taking on a novel material because of the potential of something going wrong.

A workaround on this issue would be some kind of risk-sharing mechanism, says Lord, where the government takes on some of the liability risk of using specified alternative materials.

The report on embodied carbon in NZ flagged government buildings as a good place to start on the materials decarbonisation journey.

It recommended using a life cycle assessment, such as that contained in Green Star, when specifying government building programs. It also suggested embodied carbon considerations in public and private procurement policies.

Lord was lead author of a 2017 report by climate change think tank Beyond Zero Emissions that would put Australia into a position to lead the world with a zero carbon cement industry.

It involved a suite of already commercialised technologies: geopolymer cements, high-blend cements and mineral carbonation.

Pockets of low carbon concrete innovation but business as usual prevails

Despite a sluggish start on a low carbon concrete economy there’s been some pioneering uses of the concrete alternatives in Australia, including the Brisbane West Wellcamp airport that’s almost entirely built out a type of geopolymer cement.

Projects that showcase the benefits of alternatives to Portland cement can help further the cause, such as the maintenance-free bridges developed by Deakin University for Geelong park.

They will be made from geopolymer concrete with carbon and glass fibre reinforcement that should ensure the bridge requires no maintenance over its 100 year life-span.

By replacing the steel reinforced concrete that’s usually used with a more durable carbon and glass fibre reinforced polymer, new design should avoid the usual problem of corrosion that occurs in conventional steel reinforced concrete construction.

Lord says this is an “innovative use of two technologies to get to 100 years maintenance free.”

Geopolymer cement offers big upfront opportunities

Unlike with Portland cement, where 55 per cent of its emissions come from the chemical process of limestone calcination, the reactions involved in producing geopolymer cement do not release carbon dioxide.

One way of producing geopolymer cement is with fly ash (a by-product of burning coal) and ground granulated blast-furnace slag (a steel production waste product). The 2017 report said Australia had 400 million tonnes of fly ash stockpiled from over a century of coal-burning.

Geopolymer cement isn’t suitable for all uses but Lord says it has some inherent advantages over its conventional equivalent, such as greater resistance to heat and a lot of chemicals, and it can better protect steel.

Other cement alternatives

Beyond geopolymer cements, which rely on the existence of fly ash stores from coal plants– ultimately needing to be phased out – there’s other alternatives.

One promising option is high blend cements, where Portland cement is combined with as much as 70 per cent fly ash, slag, clay or ground limestone.

There’s also mineral carbonation, which involves reacting carbon dioxide with calcium or magnesium to produce a stable solid carbonate rock, locking away emissions.

LafargeHolcim is currently using a cement technology developed by Solidia Technologies’ that uses CO2 rather than water in the curing process.

The technology reduces the overall carbon footprint in precast concrete by 70 per cent and brings down the cement plant’s carbon emissions by up to 40 per cent.

Critically, it works within the existing systems of production – the normal cement kiln just needs the temperature to be turned down.

Less concrete = less embodied carbon

There’s also other materials that, where suitable, can replace concrete entirely. Engineered timber is one of them.

Capable of locking up carbon, sustainably sourced and managed timber products such as cross laminated timber are often suitable to replace concrete in above ground uses.

Clever engineering tricks to use less concrete is another way of keeping its environmental footprint down.

Tags: , , ,

Comments

2 Responses to “Low carbon cement revolution – the options now and the challenges still ahead”

  • Josephine Wadlow-Evans says:

    Some nine years ago noted that the CFMEU were picketing a town house complex on the Old South Head Road…so being nosy parked the car and asked why this was happening…the chap said we are concerned at how toxic the concrete mix is…not only is it making site workers sick but it will continue to outgas impacting the residents and they will not even know it…
    This then brings one to the WestConnex and the immense use of concrete…and again the gas emissions from the incumbent government’s overuse of concrete fly overs and the like…and the deadly impact it will/would be having on the communities adjacent to it…one did some research and found that the impact of heat generated, on the concrete, not just from weather conditions but also vehicles allegedly increased that level of noxious emissions…ergo the mix of petrol/diesel emissions both of which contain solvent and of course solvent vapours are heavier than air… Petroleum-derived diesel is composed of about 75% saturated hydrocarbons (primarily paraffins including n, iso, and cycloparaffins), and 25% aromatic hydrocarbons (including naphthalenes and alkylbenzenes)…is a health hazard waiting to happen… According to one former professor lead was replaced with a greater use of solvents in petrol…or so one was alerted to…but cannot confirm that…

  • Ken Phelan says:

    Thank you for the very pertinent report Poppy.
    Some in Australia have been onto this for a while- but as you point out it’s traction for the transition that we need:

    https://bze.org.au/research/manufacturing-industrial-processes/rethinking-cement/

    Regards
    Ken

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Articles on this Topic