Tweet
                                               

What does engineered timber need to go mainstream?

Inside 25 King Brisbane

The future of cross laminated timber (CLT) and other engineered timber products has attracted a lot of attention this week in The Fifth Estate. For Aurecon engineer Ralph Belperio, timber has the potential to become a top sustainable building material choice – there’s just a few things holding it back.

Carbon-sequestering timber currently outstrips concrete and steel in sustainability credentials, according to Aurecon major project director Ralph Belperio.

He says the time is now for the timber industry to bring this product to the mainstream market because the steel and concrete industries are innovating fast to create greener products.

Designs for large scale timber buildings are already cropping up fairly frequently in universities, which Belperio says is because the sector tends to embrace emerging technologies early.

There’s also now a number of large scale timber office buildings, including plans for a timber addition to Melbourne Central in the CBD.

But despite its many benefits and a “fair bit of interest” in timber at the moment, Belperio said there are a number of barriers holding it back from widespread adoption.

Aurecon and the University of Technology Sydney recently ran an industry workshop to unpack these pressure points.

One significant barrier is the “slight price premium”.

“My sense is that those cost penalties shall ameliorate over time as people become more familiar with it,” he says.

It also helps that the building method cuts costs at the assembly end because it’s faster and wet trades are largely eliminated so there’s no “pumping concrete up 12 storeys.”

The supply chain in Australia is another problem. Many of the buildings are supplied out of Europe because the choice is limited locally, with XLam in Wadonga and Wesbeam some of few Australian-based options.

There’s also a standardisation piece so that authorities stop seeing all plans for timber buildings as brand new, which will lead to quicker approvals.

Another problem is that products are bespoke to the manufacturer and it is not always easy to go back later and change things during a build.

He says this requires a real change in the way the industry designs and constructs buildings.

The material is already pretty efficient at the assembly end, but Belperio suspects that if further efficiencies were unlocked in a manufacturing stage through automatics and robotics, then the material might be even more compelling.

A lack of education was another thing the engineers and university identified. He says there could be a role for TAFE and the university sectors for educating tradesman and professionals about the material, including dispelling some of the common myths.

Aurecon’s Ralph Belperio

Some key pros and cons of timber

Belperio is no “timber evangelist” and says every material has its own specific set of constraints.

It is flammable but the risks can be mitigated with good design, including a charred perimeter to protect the core of the timber.

The toxicity of the glues used in most engineered timber has also been a problem in the past, although he says most modern engineered timber products are now made with formaldehyde free-adhesives.

Responsible forest management is also key to ensuring the material remains as sustainable as possible.

One other threat to timber buildings is termites. Again, this is a design issue. Isolating the timber from the ground with a concrete platform is one way of stopping termites, he says.

Some of the key sustainability benefits of timber are that it is renewable, stores carbon, has lower embodied energy than other materials, and has a variety of biophilia-related wellbeing qualities.

It also saves time and labour, among some other lesser-known benefits such as less noise during construction. Belperio was involved in the 25 King Street in Brisbane, one of Australia’s tallest timber office buildings, where it was reported that the site was “much more respectful”.

“When having a conversation, it’s quiet enough that other people hear. Some of the simple things that we take for granted are impacted by this other form of construction.”

Aurecon’s Ralph Belperio will be speaking on this topic at Frame Australia’s Timber Offsite Construction conference in Melbourne early next week.

Tags: , ,

Comments

5 Responses to “What does engineered timber need to go mainstream?”

  • James Murray-Parkes says:

    Watch this space everyone.
    BohrHaus is coming.

  • Murray Parkes is right up to a point. CLT does gobble up large volumes of material, most of it quite unnecessarily. Remember where and why it was invented? – to use up the soft pulping timber from upper parts of high altitude pine that was previously consumed by the now diminished paper pulp industry. It was a very good solution, but the baby has grown into a hungry monster, consuming vast amounts of material that will go largely ‘unused’ either structurally, acoustically, thermally etc. It is so ‘easy’ to use that everyone who wants to design lazily has jumped on the bandwagon. Architects and engineers need to work a little harder, and use their materials with much greater care. There is no excuse for wasteful usage of valuable resources, even if renewable – and we are not planting enough to claim 100% + renewability yet. And by the way, the issue is not the production or manufacture of the product, it is the skills – or lack of them – in the fabrication and engineering sector that is inhibiting the uptake of the best range of building materials since the oak cruck. Composites – now there is an expensive pipe dream! Keep working at it Jim and bring it into useful sight – but don’t diss what really works in the meantime![unless its concrete and steel!]

  • Jack Haber says:

    Firstly to Peter, trees sequester carbon and the greatest sequestration stage is in the younger stages of tree growth, between 20 to 50 years. Environmentally, it makes sense to farm trees productively. Once sequestered the carbon is captured long term.
    Secondly to James, I admit that the push into CLT has been a somewhat ‘purist’ enterprise, as it is new to the market and the benefits needs to be proven to potential users. Once there is sufficient market acceptance of timber building in commercial projects, hybrid systems will doubtless emerge – combinations of CLT and timber framing or strategically placed steel members or concrete elements. When this happens, you will know that the emerging market is maturing.

  • Peter Cohen says:

    The trees have to be grown then chopped down to provide timber. Better to just grow forests in the space which will be left standing.

  • James Murray-Parkes says:

    It’s a fad and nothing more in my view Poppy.
    Companies are jumping on the wood bandwagon, when true composite structures are what really makes sense if we truly care about our planet. The amount of wasted mass in solid timber buildings is ridiculous.
    As an industry that preaches that it cares about the planet, there doesn’t appear to be a lot of actual sustainable thinking going on, only a lot of greed and trend thinking!
    It’s fashionable not sustainable!
    Just my 2c worth, Jim Murray-Parkes

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Articles on this Topic